Why the Big Lie?

Psyops 101

We are told diversity is our strength. We are told we have freedom of expression. We are told our personal liberties are protected by law. Lies are fed to us every day of our lives, most of which were enshrined before anyone reading this was born.

But why?

Why are we lied to about nearly everything important? Why do the established powers prefer to weave an impossibly complicated web of lies instead of a simple narrative of truth? A fair question, and one I grappled with for years as younger adult. After a decade of dissidence and thousands of hours contemplating the wisdom of Dead Racists™, I believe I am finally able to answer.

Alinksy's Rules for Radicals is the best place to start. Saul Alinksy, perhaps the most brilliant communist theorist of the 20th century, wrote the playbook for modern psyops and cultural dominance as his last work in the early 1970s. This work was meant as a guide for the younger generation of communists, whom Alinksy called the new vanguard, in hopes they would continue the never-ending revolution against the West and eventually bring about their idealised vision of Marxism. Before I go further, let's have a look at a few of Alinsky's rules...

“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

There are more, but these three should resonate with you, dissident reader, because they describe the MO of the current establishment. Conjure in your mind media narratives of the last two decades, from WMDs in Iraq to the housing bubble crisis to the COVID craze, and do your best to think of the particulars of each scenario. Attempt to remember the names of public speakers in the government and the private sector who were vocal about each event, each period. Summon, if you can, particular shock jocks, podcasters, and mouthpieces on cable news who provided commentary on each event. Do you remember their names? their faces? Can you even remember which great disaster, mass shooting, war scare, or tidbit of impending economic doom came before or after the other?

I ask rhetorically of course. No one, regardless of IQ or the masculine super power of autism, can possibly remember all, or even most, of the deafening deluge of data, factoids, political rhetoric, skewed polls, polarised news, and socioeconomic prognostication which bombard us every waking moment. Furthermore, entire events become hazy, lost in the fog of the over-informed mind. Do you recall the apocalyptic asteroid scare of the 00s? Do you even remember who Christine Blasey Ford is or why her name was relevant? Does anyone you know talk about the supposed plague of murder hornets we were warned about shortly before the plandemic?

Alinksy was not the only one to understand these tactics, nor were such concepts unique to communists.

The master propagandist of the Third Reich, Joseph Goebbels, had this to say:

"Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred."

"This is the secret of propaganda: Those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the ideas of the propaganda, without ever noticing that they are being immersed in it."

"Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will."

The brilliant Zionist advisor of the United States, Henry Kissinger, had this to say:

"If you believe that their real intention is to kill you, it isn't unreasonable to believe that they would lie to you."

"We are the ones who have been operating against our public opinion, against our bureaucracy, at the very edge of legality."

"There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full."

These three men saw the other two's political model as the enemy. These three men had different concepts of an ideal civilisation. Yet these three men came to nearly identical conclusions about power, which is the necessity of using a controlled populace as both a tool and a weapon for achieving ideological goals, for empire building.

I chose a communist revolutionary, an Aryan racialist, and a Zionist warmonger to illustrate the necessity of psyops does not stem from one political camp, one race, or one secular ideology, but from an understanding of human behaviour and an intelligent application of systems to control said behaviour.

More simply put, those with power need to control those without power to achieve their goals. Since those with power are always dramatically outnumbered by those who lack it, necessity dictates a mechanism, a user interface if you will, by which the powerful can manage the powerless.

In the era of mass communication and industrialisation, powerless people not only grew rapidly in number, but also how informed they were of events outside their local communities and the actions of those in power. This presented a real problem for the powerful. The powerless masses of the 19th and 20th centuries were raised on enlightenment ideologies, and held core beliefs of individual rights, safeguarded personal liberties, and no taxation without representation. In short, they believed in fairness between rich and poor, or equality one could say.

Those with power have always known post-enlightenment concepts are lies. Not that such concepts are inherently immoral or shouldn't be something to strive for, but that the reality of Earth is inequality and unfairness. Additionally, those with power understand there is no way to truly please the unpleasable masses. They know most men do not want to be king; that most men do not want the responsibility of war, the fate of future generations, nor the burden of governance upon their shoulders. They also know that all men crave order of some kind, so those with the desire to bring order and monger power will always be called to task. Such is life on the Third Rock, and so shall it always be.

Thusly, the age of psyops was born.

It's worth noting this is the reason why I don't call those with power today communists, facists, or nazis. They aren't, and it's foolish to ascribe to them labels of defeated ideologies and movements. Yes, that applies to Marxism as well. While it's easy to point to the blue-haired troon shrieking about the patriarchy or the antiwhite Jew pushing pedophilic pornography and call them Marxists, those who rule us are not Marxists. They are something new. They are the ruling class who emerged from the economic titans and governments that survived the World War era. They are the lords of bureaucratic management.

The communists lost. The fascists lost. The national socialists lost. And in their own way, the liberals of England and the United States also lost, their countries became vestiges of their own people and ideals, now little more than a golem of greed and global conquest.

While many lower managers and their useful idiots ascribe to Marxism, I invite you to take a look at those with real power who rule all the major countries. They are something else, and they behave in a different manner. If one needed a word in common parlance to describe them, democrat would be close to the mark, but even still that would be inaccurate because they know democracy to be yet another lie, another tool of herding the sheeple.

I call them oligarchs, and when appropriate (as is often the case) antiwhite oligarchs. The oligarchs rule not by naked power nor by divine right of kings. They decree dogma from temples of social and financial enslavement. They rule from synagogues of usury and ethnic erasure.

Why the ethnic erasure? Why are both nationalism and Christianity (the West's main religion) vilified by the establishment? Why are we lied to about the biological White erasure from mass migration, birth control, abortions, and state-enforced homosexuality? Why are laws, tax codes, and public institutions constructed to encode us with this dogma?

At this point of the article, a clever reader might be pondering a more pertinent series of questions, such as...

Why are we given a new global or national crisis every 6 to 12 months? Why does the media feed us nothing but an endless parade of doom and fear? Why does the same media present us with an equally endless series of people and organisations to blame, but never name the oligarchs? Why are billions of dollars spent on entertainment media with conflicting sociopolitical messaging? Why are the major governments of the world inserting their agents and tendrils of control into social media?

The answer should already be apparent. We must be controlled, and the technology developed to do so is the never-ending psyop.

Think of Alinksy's rules again: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

Think of Goebbels's wisdom again: "This is the secret of propaganda: Those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the ideas of the propaganda, without ever noticing that they are being immersed in it."

Think of Kissinger's snark again: "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full."

The point of psyops is not to make people believe it's all true, but to make people doubt if anything is true. Without a concept of truth, there is no true north for the compass. The purpose is to keep the masses complacent; paralysed with confusion, fear, and lack of direction. It is for this same reason antiwhite oligarchs push ethnic erasure.

The antiwhite narrative pushed by the antiwhite oligarchs aligns with the necessary basics of all the other oligarchs. A healthy ethnic identity leads to independent communities of self-sufficient family clans and insular religious communities who stay mostly isolated from the psyops and public indoctrination. These are anomalies the empire of lies cannot tolerate, because the oligarchs cannot control them via their only functioning mechanism. Hence why antiwhitism and the technocracy of managerial oligarchs are one and the same. They have the same needs despite varying personal motivations.

I write this because it needs to be known by all dissidents. We must embrace the world we live in and act accordingly. For the vast majority of us, we will never have power of any kind. A scant few of us may have power one day, but it will not rival those in power now. If we are to have the power to shape our fate, it will be a multi-generational effort to obtain the real power required. We must build with those who understand the herculean task ahead and can handle the burden of this knowledge without buckling.

In an era where nothing is true, where everything is fake until proven ghey, it is difficult to have direction. No matter what gives you direction, whether it be love of your people, pursuing a wholesome lifestyle, or building a religious community, you must condition yourself to withstand the never-ending psyop, because it will outlive every single one of us.

Keep heart, reader, their house of cards can’t stand forever.